Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine Vicious
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nine Vicious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested draftification, no sources given at all. Doing a WP:BEFORE, I did find this Pitchfork review that might be WP:RS, but that's it. I don't think there's enough sourcing out there to meet WP:GNG. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Georgia (U.S. state). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- delete- completely ridiculous, promotional nonsense about a non notable subject CUPIDICAE❤️ 19:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify as clearly not ready for the mainspace. Herinalian (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails notability and WP:MUSICBIO. I was unable to find any additional news about this person. Maxcreator (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.